Rm. Pino et al., A COMPARISON OF THE INTUBATION CONDITIONS BETWEEN MIVACURIUM AND ROCURONIUM DURING BALANCED ANESTHESIA, Anesthesiology, 88(3), 1998, pp. 673-678
Background: Comparisons of the intubation conditions with mivacurium a
nd rocuronium from previous reports are confounded by the use of varie
d induction regimens. The authors compared intubation conditions of mi
vacurium, rocuronium, and a placebo at 90 s and their recovery profile
s during anesthesia with nitrous oxide, oxygen, and propofol. Methods:
After induction with midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol in a randomize
d blinded study, 100 patients received one of the following treatments
: 0.25 mg/kg mivacurium in divided doses (0.15 mg/kg followed by 0.1 m
g/kg 30 s later); 0.45, 0.6, 0.9, or 1.2 mg/kg rocuronium; or placebo,
Evoked thumb adduction was measured throughout. Intubation was attemp
ted 90 s after the initial dose of mivacurium and other treatment dose
s by a ''blinded'' physician. Intubating conditions were graded as exc
ellent, good, poor, or not possible. Spontaneous recovery was studied
until a 25% initial twitch height was reached. Mean arterial blood pre
ssure and heart rate changes between groups were determined before ind
uction through 6 min after administration of the study drugs. Results:
There were no important changes or intergroup differences in mean art
erial blood pressure and heart rate. Intubation conditions were good o
r excellent for both mivacurium and rocuronium at the 0.9 mg/kg dose (
93%) and at the 1.2 mg/kg dose (100%). Rocuronium at the 0.6 mg/kg dos
e was excellent in 27% of patients, whereas rocuronium at the 0.45 mg/
kg dose had the least number of excellent conditions and the most poor
or not possible assessments. Patients given placebo could not be intu
bated, Times to maximum blockade for 0.9 and 1.2 mg/kg rocuronium were
the shortest, The times to 25% recovery for 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (mea
n +/- SD = 27 +/- 8.6 min), 0.9 mg/kg (43.1 +/- 10.8), and 1.2 mg/kg (
62.3 +/- 17.4 min) mere significantly longer than were those for mivac
urium (17.4 +/- 6.2 min). Conclusions: Mivacurium in a 0.25 mg/kg divi
ded dose and rocuronium at 0.9 mg/kg and 1.2 mg/kg provide good or exc
ellent intubation conditions at 90 s in most patients. Rocuronium was
faster in onset at the higher doses (0.9 and 1.2 mg/ kg) but had more
prolonged recovery times to 25% single twitch height.