NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR EWINGS-SARCOMA OF BONE - NO BENEFIT OBSERVED AFTER ADDING IFOSFAMIDE AND ETOPOSIDE TO VINCRISTINE, ACTINOMYCIN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, AND DOXORUBICIN IN THE MAINTENANCE PHASE - RESULTSOF 2 SEQUENTIAL STUDIES
G. Bacci et al., NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR EWINGS-SARCOMA OF BONE - NO BENEFIT OBSERVED AFTER ADDING IFOSFAMIDE AND ETOPOSIDE TO VINCRISTINE, ACTINOMYCIN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, AND DOXORUBICIN IN THE MAINTENANCE PHASE - RESULTSOF 2 SEQUENTIAL STUDIES, Cancer, 82(6), 1998, pp. 1174-1183
BACKGROUND, IFosfamide (IF) alone or combined with etoposide (ET) was
reported to be effective in the treatment of patients with Ewing's sar
coma who relapsed after treatment with the VACA regimen, which consist
ed of vincristine (VC), actinomycin (AC), cyclophosphamide (CP), and d
oxorubicin (AD). The purpose of this article is to report the results
achieved in a new neoadjuvant protocol in which IF and ET were added t
o the conventional VACA regimen and administered to patients with loca
lized disease. METHODS. In this study, eighty-two patients were treate
d between May 1988 and October 1991. Chemotherapy consisted of two ind
uction cycles of VC/CP/AD followed by alternating cycles of VC/AD/CP,
VC/IF/AC, IF/ET, and VC/CP/AC after local treatment. Twenty-two patien
ts (27%) were treated with surgery only, 22 (27%) underwent surgery fo
llowed by radiation therapy, and 38 (46%) received radiotherapy only.
RESULTS. At a median follow-up of 6.7 years (range, 4-9 years), 43 pat
ients (52%) remained continuously disease free, and 39 relapsed (34 wi
th metastases, 4 with local recurrence and metastases, and 1 with a lo
cal recurrence). These results were similar to those obtained at the s
ame institute in a previous neoadjuvant study (March 1983 and April 19
88) that included 108 patients treated with the conventional 4-drug re
gimen. The 5-year disease free and overall survival in the current stu
dy were 54% and 59%, respectively, and in the first study were 50% and
56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. The comparison of these two sequentia
l studies, although not randomized, referred to homogeneous groups of
patients observed at the same institution who were treated by the same
medical team. No advantage was observed when IF and ET were added to
the VACA regimen. (C) 1998 American Cancer Society.