Ame. Winther et al., CHARACTERIZATION OF ACTIONS OF LEUCOPHAEA TACHYKININ-RELATED PEPTIDES(LEMTRPS) AND PROCTOLIN ON COCKROACH HINDGUT CONTRACTIONS, Peptides, 19(3), 1998, pp. 445-458
The nine Leucophaea Tachykinin-Related Peptides (LemTRP 1-9) isolated
from the midgut and brain of the cockroach, Leucophaea maderae, all in
duced increases in spontaneous contractions of the L. maderae hindgut.
Synthetic LemTRP 1 and 3-9, were equally potent in inducing contracti
ons of the hindgut. More than seven of the nine C-terminal residues of
the closely related locust peptide locustatachykinin I (LomTK I) are
required for full activity of the peptide on the L. maderae hindgut. P
roctolin, a well characterized myostimulatory neuropeptide, was shown
to be more potent than LemTRPs. LemTRP 1 and proctolin did not have sy
nergistic actions in potentiating the amplitude and tonus of contracti
ons of the L. maderae hindgut. Several differences could be seen in ac
tions of LemTRP 1 and proctolin. In contrast to proctolin, LemTRP 1 co
uld not override the inhibitory action of 10(-9) M of the myoinhibitor
y peptide leucomyosuppressin. Spantide I, an antagonist of the mammali
an tachykinin receptors, at a concentration of 5 mu M, blocked the res
ponse to LemTRP 1, but not to proctolin. The competitive proctolin rec
eptor antagonist [alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine(2)]-proctolin blocked the ac
tion of both proctolin and LemTRP 1 when applied at 1 mu M, whereas cy
cloproctolin had no antagonist action on either peptide. Verapamil, a
blocker of voltage gated Ca2+-channels, and the less specific Ca2+-cha
nnel blocker Mn2+, abolished the action of LemTRP 1, but not of procto
lin. The results obtained indicate that LemTRPs act on receptors disti
nct from those of proctolin. Double label immunocytochemistry revealed
that all LomTK-like immunoreactive fibers impinge on the proctolinerg
ic fibers in the hindgut. This finding and the inhibitory actions of C
a2+-channel blockers on TRP responses and of the proctolin receptor an
tagonist on both peptides, may suggest that the LemTRP receptors are n
ot on the hindgut muscle fibers but on the terminals of the proctoline
rgic neurons. Thus, LemTRPs may induce release of proctolin on the hin
dgut. An alternative is that LemTRPs act by mechanisms clearly distinc
t from those of proctolin. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.