DIFFERENCES IN REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY VERSUS P24 ANTIGEN-DETECTION IN CELL-CULTURE, WHEN COMPARING A HOMOGENEOUS GROUP OF HIV TYPE-1 SUBTYPE-B VIRUSES WITH A HETEROGENEOUS GROUP OF DIVERGENT STRAINS
Ge. Corrigan et al., DIFFERENCES IN REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVITY VERSUS P24 ANTIGEN-DETECTION IN CELL-CULTURE, WHEN COMPARING A HOMOGENEOUS GROUP OF HIV TYPE-1 SUBTYPE-B VIRUSES WITH A HETEROGENEOUS GROUP OF DIVERGENT STRAINS, AIDS research and human retroviruses, 14(4), 1998, pp. 347-352
Failure to detect infection with HIV-1 non-B subtypes in some antibody
screening assays has been shown, To date, however, no studies have be
en published evaluating the capacity of standard tests to quantify rep
lication of divergent HIV-1 in cell culture, Reverse transcriptase (RT
) activity and p24 antigen assays are the two methods most commonly us
ed for this purpose, A homogeneous panel of HIV-1 subtype B viruses fr
om northern Italy and a heterogeneous panel of diverse genetic subtype
s (A to F and 0) from different regions of the world were cultured und
er identical conditions, A new nonradioactive RT assay was used as a b
asis for comparison to evaluate the capacity of two p24 assays to quan
tify viral growth in both panels. Comparison of the p24 amount/RT acti
vity (p24/RT) ratios showed that ratios in the subtype B panel tended
to be markedly higher than in the diverse subtype panel, Greatest vari
ation was seen with one of the subtype O isolates, where up to a 400 t
imes lower ratio was obtained compared with the average ratio for the
subtype B panel, In addition, one Thai subtype B virus also gave a mar
kedly reduced ratio, Furthermore, comparison between the two p24 assay
s showed different abilities to detect p24 from different HIV-1 isolat
es, We discuss limitations for the use of anti-HIV-1 p24 antibodies pr
oduced by immunization with subtype B p24 in p24 assays.