MULTICENTER STUDY OF OXYGEN-INSENSITIVE HAND-HELD GLUCOSE POINT-OF-CARE TESTING IN CRITICAL CARE HOSPITAL AMBULATORY PATIENTS IN THE UNITED-STATES AND CANADA
Gj. Kost et al., MULTICENTER STUDY OF OXYGEN-INSENSITIVE HAND-HELD GLUCOSE POINT-OF-CARE TESTING IN CRITICAL CARE HOSPITAL AMBULATORY PATIENTS IN THE UNITED-STATES AND CANADA, Critical care medicine, 26(3), 1998, pp. 581-590
Objectives: Existing handheld glucose meters are glucose oxidase (GO)-
based, Oxygen side reactions can introduce oxygen dependency, increase
potential error, and limit clinical use. Our primary objectives were
to: a) introduce a new glucose dehydrogenase (GD)-based electrochemica
l biosensor for point-of-care testing; b) determine the oxygen-sensiti
vity of GO-and GD-based electrochemical biosensor test strips; and c)
evaluate the clinical performance of the new Go-based glucose meter sy
stem in critical care/hospital/ambulatory patients. Design: Multicente
r study sites compared glucose levels determined with GD-based biosens
ors to glucose levels determined in whole brood with a perchloric acid
deproteinization hexokinase reference method, One site also studied G
O-based biosensors and venous plasma glucose measured with a chemistry
analyzer, Biosensor test strips were used with a handheld glucose mon
itoring system, Bench and clinical oxygen sensitivity, hematocrit effe
ct, and precision were evaluated. Setting: The study was performed at
eight U.S. medical centers and one Canadian medical center. Patients:
There were 1,248 patients, Results: The GO-based biosensor was oxygen
sensitive. The new GD-based biosensor was oxygen-insensitive. GD-based
bio sensor performance was acceptable: 2,104 (96.1%) of 2,189 glucose
meter measurements were within +/-15 mg/dL (+/-0.83 mmol/L) for gluco
se revels of less than or equal to 100 mg/dL (less than or equal to 5.
55 mmol/L) or within +/-15% for glucose levels of >100 mg/dL, compared
with the whole-blood reference method results, With the GD-based bios
ensor, the percentages of glucose measurements that were not within th
e error tolerance were comparable for different specimen types and cli
nical groups, Bracket predictive values were acceptable for glucose le
vels used in therapeutic management, Conclusions: The performance of G
D-based, oxygen-insensitive, handheld glucose testing was technically
suitable for arterial specimens in critical care patients, cord blood
and heelstick specimens in neonates, and capillary and venous specimen
s in other patients, Multicenter findings benchmark the performance of
bedside glucose testing devices, With the new +/-15 mg/dL --> 100 mg/
dL --> +/-15% accuracy criterion, point-of-care systems for handheld g
lucose testing should score 95% (or better), as compared with the reco
mmended reference method, Physiologic changes, preanalytical factors,
confounding variables, and treatment goals must be taken into consider
ation when interpreting glucose results, especially in critically ill
patients, for whom arterial blood glucose measurements wilt reflect sy
stemic glucose levels.