Objective: Evaluate the clinical utility of several simple measures of
static and dynamic equilibrium in human subjects. In particular, one
proposed clinical measure, the Clinical Test of Sensory Integration an
d Balance (CTSIB) was compared with dynamic posturography for the meas
urement of postural control capabilities. Study Design: Cross-sectiona
l study of normal subjects and prospective observational study of the
same performance measures in vestibular disorder patients. Setting: Ac
ademic tertiary care referral center. Participants: Data were collecte
d for all test measures from a group of normal subjects (ages, 20 to 7
9 years), as well as for a group of patients undergoing treatment for
vestibular dysfunction. Results: Data suggest that several semiquantit
ative clinical tests of static and dynamic equilibrium can be helpful
in evaluating and monitoring patients with chronic vestibular dysfunct
ion. The CTSIB results seem to correlate well with dynamic posturograp
hy, suggesting that this measure may be useful in identifying patients
with abnormal postural control. Formal dynamic posturography testing
appears to be more sensitive in detecting abnormal postural control an
d more exact in defining the specific pattern of dysfunction. Conclusi
on: Simple clinical measures of static and dynamic equilibrium can rel
iably distinguish vestibular disorder patients from normal subjects. D
ynamic posturography continues to play an important role in the functi
onal evaluation and management of vestibular disorder patients.