Am. Buckle et al., A STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR GROEL-POLYPEPTIDE RECOGNITION, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 94(8), 1997, pp. 3571-3575
A monomeric peptide fragment of GroEL, consisting of residues 191-376,
is a mini-chaperone with a functional chaperoning activity. We have s
olved the crystal structure at 1.7 Angstrom resolution of GroEL(191-37
6) with a 17-residue N-terminal tag. The N-terminal tag of one molecul
e binds in the active site of a neighboring molecule in the crystal. T
his appears to mimic the binding of a peptide substrate molecule. Seve
n substrate residues are bound in a relatively extended conformation.
Interactions between the substrate and the active site are predominant
ly hydrophobic, but there are also four hydrogen bonds between the mai
n chain of the substrate and side chains of the active site. Although
the preferred conformation of a bound substrate is essentially extende
d, the flexibility of the active site may allow it to accommodate the
binding of exposed hydrophobic surfaces in general, such as molten glo
bule-type structures. GroEL can therefore help unfold proteins by bind
ing to a hydrophobic region and exert a binding pressure toward the fu
lly unfolded state, thus acting as an ''unfoldase.'' The structure of
the mini-chaperone is very similar to that of residues 191-376 in inta
ct GroEL, so we can build it into GroEL and reconstruct how a peptide
can bind to the tetradecamer. A ring of connected binding sites is not
ed that can explain many aspects of substrate binding and activity.