K. Sandelin et al., MANAGEMENT, MORBIDITY, AND ONCOLOGIC ASPECTS IN 100 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION, Annals of surgical oncology, 5(2), 1998, pp. 159-165
Background: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is indicated when br
east-conserving surgery is inappropriate and the patient refuses maste
ctomy as the sole procedure. Methods: Management, morbidity, and oncol
ogic aspects were studied in 100 consecutive patients treated between
1990 and 1994 with a minimum follow-up time of 2 years. Indications fo
r mastectomy and IBR always were discussed within a multidisciplinary
group. Eighty-four patients had primary breast cancer, 12 patients und
erwent salvage mastectomy for an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence,
two patients had benign breast disease, and two patients underwent pro
phylactic mastectomy because of familial breast cancer. Results: Salin
e and silicone gel-filled implants were used predominantly (88%), but
free and pedicled TRAM flaps were performed in 12 patients (12%). The
overall complication rate was 16%. Seven patients lost their implants,
three of whom had been irradiated to the chest wall. Sixty-five patie
nts completed breast reconstruction (nipple and areola) within a media
n time of 418 days (range 40 to 1471 days). At follow-up, eight patien
ts had locoregional recurrences after a median time of 7.2 months (ran
ge 1 to 23 months), and nine patients had died from disseminated breas
t cancer. Conclusion: IBR is time-consuming, but it is well tolerated
and does not interfere with oncologic adjuvant treatment. IBR can be p
erformed with low morbidity by a dedicated multidisciplinary team.