Gr. Ebenbichler et al., ULTRASOUND TREATMENT FOR TREATING THE CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME - RANDOMIZED SHAM CONTROLLED TRIAL, BMJ. British medical journal, 316(7133), 1998, pp. 731-735
Objective: To assess the efficacy of ultrasound treatment for mild to
moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Design: Randomised, double
blind, ''sham'' controlled trial with assessments at baseline, after
2 weeks' and 7 weeks' treatment and at a follow up assessment 6 months
later (8 months after baseline evaluation), Setting Outpatient clinic
of a university department of physical medicine and rehabilitation in
Vienna. Subjects: 45 patients with mild to moderate bilateral carpal
tunnel syndrome as verified by electroneurography. Intervention: 20 se
ssions of ultrasound (active) treatment (1 MHz, 1.0 W/cm(2), pulsed mo
de 1:4, 15 minutes per session) applied to the area over the carpal tu
nnel of one wrist, and indistinguishable sham ultrasound treatment app
lied to the other. The first 10 treatments were performed daily (5 ses
sions/week); 10 further treatments were twice weekly for 5 weeks. Main
outcome measures: Score of subjective symptom ratings assessed by vis
ual analogue scale; electroneurographic measures (for example, motor d
istal latency and sensory antidromic nerve conduction velocity). Resul
ts: Improvement was significantly more pronounced in actively treated
than in sham treated mists for both subjective symptoms (P < 0.001, pa
ired t test) and electroneurographic variables (motor distal latency P
< 0.001, paired t test; sensory antidromic nerve conduction velocity
P < 0.001, paired t test). Effects were sustained at 6 months' follow
up. Conclusion: Results suggest there are satisfying short to medium t
erm effects due to ultrasound treatment in patients with mild to moder
ate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Findings need to be confirmed,
and ultrasound treatment will have to be compared with standard conser
vative and invasive treatment options.