C. Briand et al., STRATIGRAPHY AND SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE MOSCOVIAN, KASIMOVIAN AND GZHELIAN IN THE MOSCOW BASIN, Bulletin de la Societe geologique de France, 169(1), 1998, pp. 35-52
The Moscovian deposits form a second order sequence (5-6 m.y.) with a
complete cycle of tectono-eustatic variations including a lowstand sys
tem tract (LST), a transgressive system tract (TST) and a highstand sy
stem tract (HST). The Moscovian deposits are subdivided into four form
ations or third order sequences (1 m.y.) named Vereia, Kashira, Podols
k and Myachkovo by the Russian stratigraphers; which can be further su
bdivided into members or fourth order sequences (about 500 k.y.); whic
h in turn can be further subdivided into elementary sequences (about 1
00 k.y.). Vereia shows two fourth order sequences, Kashira four, Podol
sk three and Myachkovo two. The Kasimovian deposits Form a second orde
r sequence (3-5 m.y.) with a complete cycle of tectono-eustatic variat
ions. They are subdivided into three formations or four third order se
quences (1 m.y.) named Krevyakino, Khamovnichi, Dorogomilovo; which ca
n be further subdivided into members or fourth order sequences (about
600 k.y.); which in turn can br further subdivided into elementary seq
uences (about 250 k.y.). Each third order sequence shows two fourth or
der sequences, the first more transgressive and the second more regres
sive. The Gzhelian deposits form a second order sequence (5-6 m.y.) wi
th a complete cycle of tectono-eustatic variations. They are subdivide
d into five formations or five third order sequences (1 m.y.) named Re
chitsy, Amerevc, Pavlov-Posad, Noginsk and Melekhovo; which can be fur
ther subdivided into members or fourth order sequences (about 600 k.y.
) which can be in turn further subdivided into elementary sequences (a
bout 200 k.y.). Each third order sequence shows two fourth order seque
nces, the first more transgressive and the second more regressive. At
whatever order, the sequences present a similar organization: the TST
consists mainly of limey deposits. The overlying deposits are more cla
yey and dolomitic: they represent a HST with terrigenous supply. In or
der to check the continuity of the sequences, our data have been compa
red with previously described boreholes located on West-East cross-sec
tions. Except for the Tsna Member known only eastwards, the same fourt
h order sequences number is recorded within the basin. During the Mosc
ovian and Kasimovian time, the Moscow Basin presents a thinner western
border and a eastern trough. During the Gzhelian time, some inversion
s in subsidence occur. For the mechanisms of genesis of these sequence
s. their continuity proves the allocyclicity. However, the tectonics a
nd the eustasy interfere. The tectonic subsidence is low or moderate i
n the Moscow Basin. The fourth order sequences are more prominent than
the third order sequences, which would be characteristic of an eustas
y produced by the melting of polar ice cap located in Gondwanaland dur
ing the late Carboniferous. However, the stratigraphic completeness an
d the associated preservation of the sequences are low at the western
border of the basin and better eastwards.