Ra. Cohen et al., NITRIC-OXIDE IS THE MEDIATOR OF BOTH ENDOTHELIUM-DEPENDENT RELAXATIONAND HYPERPOLARIZATION OF THE RABBIT CAROTID-ARTERY, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 94(8), 1997, pp. 4193-4198
It is controversial whether the endothelial cell release of nitric oxi
de (NO) or a different factor(s) accounts for endothelium-dependent hy
perpolarization, because in many arteries endothelium-dependent relaxa
tion and hyperpolarization resists inhibitors of NO synthase. The cont
ribution of NO to acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent hyperpol
arization and relaxation of the rabbit carotid artery was determined b
y measuring NO with electrochemical and chemiluminescence techniques.
In the presence of phenylephrine to depolarize and contract the smooth
muscle cells, acetylcholine caused concentration-dependent hyperpolar
ization and relaxation which were closely correlated to the release of
NO. N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (30 mu M) partially reduced
the release of NO and caused a similar reduction in smooth muscle cel
l relaxation and hyperpolarization. To determine if the residual respo
nses were mediated by another endothelium-derived mediator or NO relea
sed despite treatment with N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, N-om
ega-nitro-L-arginine (300 mu M) was added. The combined inhibitors fur
ther reduced, but did not eliminate, NO release, smooth muscle relaxat
ion, and hyperpolarization. Hyperpolarization and relaxation to acetyl
choline remained closely correlated with the release of NO in the pres
ence of the inhibitors. In addition, the NO donor, SIN-1, caused hyper
polarization and relaxation which correlated with the concentrations o
f NO that it released. These studies indicate that (i) the release of
NO by acetylcholine is only partially inhibited by these inhibitors of
NO synthase when used even at high concentrations, and (ii) NO rather
than another factor accounts fully for endothelium-dependent response
s of the rabbit carotid artery.