Objective: Quantification of the incidence of pruritus after hydroxyet
hylstarch infusion therapy, identification of potential predictors. De
sign and Setting: Prospective multicentre study at two departments of
otorhinolaryngology and at one department of general surgery, vascular
surgery, anaesthesia and internal medicine - angiology, respectively,
Patients: 497 patients with different indications (haemodilution, vol
ume substitution) for hydroxyethylstarch infusions (intervention group
), 47 with comparable primary diseases without hydroxyethylstarch appl
ication (control group), Interventions: Hydroxyethylstarch infusion th
erapy according to local standard, Recording of pruritus symptoms and
potential predictors before, during and after hydroxyethylstarch infus
ion therapy or alternative treatment (control group). Observation peri
od 3-9 weeks after end of therapy, Results: Incidence of pruritus afte
r hydroxyethylstarch therapy in 5 cases. In all cases, otologic primar
y disease. Within the otologic patient population, relation between pr
uritus risk and amount of infused hydroxyethylstarch. In the control g
roup, incidence of pruritus after therpay in 2 cases. Conclusions: The
re is no elevated pruritus risk for the administration of hydroxyethyl
starch in usual doses in a wide range of indications in internal medic
ine, surgery and anaesthesia, For reasons unclear so far, incidence of
pruritus in the treatment of otologic diseases is increased. Because
of the observed dose-risk relation, a maximum total hydroxyethylstarch
dosage of 300 g in regimens with daily infusions is recommended.