Rg. Pirrallo et al., THE POTENTIAL BENEFIT OF A HOME FIRE SAFETY INTERVENTION DURING EMERGENCY MEDICAL-SERVICES CALLS, Academic emergency medicine, 5(3), 1998, pp. 220-224
Objective: To determine how often house fires occur at 1- and 2-family
dwellings visited previously by emergency medical services (EMS) pers
onnel and whether these visits were missed opportunities for a point-o
f-contact home fire safety intervention, Methods: A retrospective, con
secutive, case series analysis of all Milwaukee Fire Department alarm
responses during 1994 was performed, Measurements included date of ser
vice, type of response, property type, dollar loss estimate, number of
injuries and fatalities, cause of alarm, and presence of an operation
al smoke detector, Descriptive, chi(2), and relative risk statistics w
ere used to describe the relationship between EMS responses and fire r
esponses at 1- and 2-family dwellings, Results: The Milwaukee Fire Dep
artment dispatched 94,378 requests for service to 43,556 addresses, 16
,150 addresses generated multiple requests; 7.2% (1,162/16,150) were f
or an ''alarm of fire'' response [relative risk 1.53 (95% CI: 1.69-1.9
9) for addresses with multiple requests vs those with a single request
for service], Most [62% (721/1,162)] of the addresses were visited by
EMS personnel prior to the alarm; 28% (205/721) were 1- and 2-family
dwellings, A mean of 1.8 (376/205) EMS responses occurred prior to the
''alarm of fire'' response; 121 addresses received 1 response, 46 rec
eived 2, 18 received 3, and 20 received greater than or equal to 4 res
ponses. Of 169 addresses with complete data, there was a total fire do
llar loss of $1,963,020 (1994) along with 32 injuries and 0 fatalities
. While 47% (80/169) of the 1- and 2-family dwellings had a smoke dete
ctor present, only 17% (29/169) of the dwellings had an operational sm
oke detector. Conclusions: A point-of-contact home fire safety interve
ntion appears of potential benefit for frequent users of EMS cafe. Det
ermination of the presence of an operational smoke detector in 1- and
2-family dwellings may be a useful injury prevention act during such E
MS calls.