H. Dinc et al., PORTAL AND SPLANCHNIC HEMODYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED POSTHEPATITIC CIRRHOSIS AND IN HEALTHY-ADULTS - ASSESSMENT WITH DUPLEX-DOPPLERULTRASOUND, Acta radiologica, 39(2), 1998, pp. 152-156
Purpose: To assess portal and splanchnic haemodynamics, and splanchnic
vascular resistance in patients with advanced post-hepatitic cirrhosi
s and in healthy volunteers, by means of duplex Doppler ultrasound (US
). Material and Methods: The duplex Doppler US examination was perform
ed in 16 patients with cirrhosis and in 24 healthy volunteers. We inve
stigated vessel diameters, mean flow velocities, and mean blood flows
in the portal vein, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and the sple
nic artery (SA), and measured the resistive index values of SMA and SA
. Results: The mean portal venous blood flow in patients with cirrhosi
s (829+/-264 ml/min) was not statistically different from those in the
volunteers (734+/-194 ml/min). The ratio of the SMA and SA blood flow
s (621 ml/min) to the portal venous blood flow (734 ml/min) was 0.85 i
n the control subjects. The mean portal venous blood flow (1 261 ml/mi
n) and the portal venous velocity (14.6 cm/s) were higher in the patie
nts with recanalized para-umbilical veins than in the volunteers and i
n the patients without recanalized para-umbilical veins. The SMA and S
A blood flows were significantly increased in patients with cirrhosis
compared with volunteers. Splanchnic inflow (the sum of the SMA and SA
. blood flows) was higher than the portal blood flow in patients with
cirrhosis except in the subjects with recanalized para-umbilical veins
. SMA and SA resistive index values were significantly higher in these
patients than in the volunteers. Conclusion: Splanchnic blood how and
splanchnic vascular impedance increased significantly in patients wit
h advanced post-hepatitic cirrhosis. Splanchnic inflow must not exceed
portal venous blood flow in patients with recanalized para-umbilical
veins. Portal vein velocity and portal venous blood flow measurements
alone are not useful parameters for discriminating patients with cirrh
osis from healthy subjects.