BOSTON NAMING TEST DISCONTINUATION RULE - RIGOROUS VERSUS LENIENT INTERPRETATIONS

Citation
Tj. Ferman et al., BOSTON NAMING TEST DISCONTINUATION RULE - RIGOROUS VERSUS LENIENT INTERPRETATIONS, Assessment, 5(1), 1998, pp. 13-18
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
Journal title
ISSN journal
10731911
Volume
5
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
13 - 18
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-1911(1998)5:1<13:BNTDR->2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Two interpretations of the Boston Naming Test (BNT) discontinuation ru le of ''six consecutive failures'' were uncovered in an informal surve y. The rigorous interpretation includes correct responses to phonemic cues in the count of failures, whereas the lenient interpretation does not. Using both methods to score the same protocols, BNT final scores were changed in 3% of 655 normal elderly persons and in 31% of 140 pa tients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Among normals, discrepant scores were most often found in persons age 80 years and older, and scores d iffered by up to 16 points. Among AD patients, discrepant scores did n ot preferentially occur in any age group, but scores differed by up to 10 points. The clinical impact of BNT scoring differences occasionall y can be substantial and warrants attention.