PANCREATIC BETA-CELL RESPONSIVENESS DURING MEAL TOLERANCE-TEST - MODEL ASSESSMENT IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND SUBJECTS WITH NEWLY-DIAGNOSED NONINSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS
R. Hovorka et al., PANCREATIC BETA-CELL RESPONSIVENESS DURING MEAL TOLERANCE-TEST - MODEL ASSESSMENT IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND SUBJECTS WITH NEWLY-DIAGNOSED NONINSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 83(3), 1998, pp. 744-750
A model-based method was developed to quantify pancreatic beta-cell re
sponsiveness during a meal tolerance test (MTT). C peptide secretion w
as related in a linear fashion to glucose concentration, whereas the s
tandard population model was used to derive transfer rate constants of
the two compartmental model of C peptide kinetics. Two indexes of pan
creatic beta-cell responsiveness were defined: 1) postprandial sensiti
vity M-I (ability of postprandial glucose to stimulate beta-cell), and
2) basal sensitivity M-0 (ability of fasting glucose to stimulate bet
a-cell). The method was evaluated using plasma glucose and C peptide m
easured over 180 min with a 10- to 30-min sampling interval during a M
TT (75 g carbohydrates; 500 Cal) performed in 16 normal subjects (7 me
n and 9 women; age, 50 +/- 10 yr; body mass index, 29.2 +/- 3.6 kg/m(2
); fasting plasma glucose, 5.1 +/- 0.5 mmol/L; mean +/- SD) and 16 bod
y mass index-matched subjects with newly diagnosed noninsulin-dependen
t diabetes mellitus (NIDDM; 15 men and 1 woman; age, 50 +/- 9 yr; body
mass index, 29.3 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2); fasting plasma glucose, 12.6 +/- 3.
2 mmol/L). M-I and M-0 indexes were estimated with very good precision
(coefficient of variation, < 15%). Subjects with NIDDM demonstrated l
ower postprandial sensitivity M-I (17.7 +/- 11.4 vs. 90.0 +/- 43.3 x 1
0(-9)/min; NIDDM vs. normal, P < 0.001) and basal sensitivity M-0 (5.4
+/- 2.2 vs. 10.3 +/- 4.9 x 10(-9)/min; P < 0.005). Deconvolution anal
ysis documented that the relationship between C peptide secretion and
glucose concentration is approximately linear during MTT in both norma
l subjects (plasma glucose range, 5-8 mmol/L) and subjects with NIDDM
(12-17 mmol/L). We conclude that pancreatic responsiveness during gluc
ose stimulation (M-I) and under basal conditions (M-0) can be obtained
from this novel method during MTT in healthy and disease states.