PANCREATIC BETA-CELL RESPONSIVENESS DURING MEAL TOLERANCE-TEST - MODEL ASSESSMENT IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND SUBJECTS WITH NEWLY-DIAGNOSED NONINSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS

Citation
R. Hovorka et al., PANCREATIC BETA-CELL RESPONSIVENESS DURING MEAL TOLERANCE-TEST - MODEL ASSESSMENT IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND SUBJECTS WITH NEWLY-DIAGNOSED NONINSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 83(3), 1998, pp. 744-750
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
0021972X
Volume
83
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
744 - 750
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(1998)83:3<744:PBRDMT>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
A model-based method was developed to quantify pancreatic beta-cell re sponsiveness during a meal tolerance test (MTT). C peptide secretion w as related in a linear fashion to glucose concentration, whereas the s tandard population model was used to derive transfer rate constants of the two compartmental model of C peptide kinetics. Two indexes of pan creatic beta-cell responsiveness were defined: 1) postprandial sensiti vity M-I (ability of postprandial glucose to stimulate beta-cell), and 2) basal sensitivity M-0 (ability of fasting glucose to stimulate bet a-cell). The method was evaluated using plasma glucose and C peptide m easured over 180 min with a 10- to 30-min sampling interval during a M TT (75 g carbohydrates; 500 Cal) performed in 16 normal subjects (7 me n and 9 women; age, 50 +/- 10 yr; body mass index, 29.2 +/- 3.6 kg/m(2 ); fasting plasma glucose, 5.1 +/- 0.5 mmol/L; mean +/- SD) and 16 bod y mass index-matched subjects with newly diagnosed noninsulin-dependen t diabetes mellitus (NIDDM; 15 men and 1 woman; age, 50 +/- 9 yr; body mass index, 29.3 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2); fasting plasma glucose, 12.6 +/- 3. 2 mmol/L). M-I and M-0 indexes were estimated with very good precision (coefficient of variation, < 15%). Subjects with NIDDM demonstrated l ower postprandial sensitivity M-I (17.7 +/- 11.4 vs. 90.0 +/- 43.3 x 1 0(-9)/min; NIDDM vs. normal, P < 0.001) and basal sensitivity M-0 (5.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 10.3 +/- 4.9 x 10(-9)/min; P < 0.005). Deconvolution anal ysis documented that the relationship between C peptide secretion and glucose concentration is approximately linear during MTT in both norma l subjects (plasma glucose range, 5-8 mmol/L) and subjects with NIDDM (12-17 mmol/L). We conclude that pancreatic responsiveness during gluc ose stimulation (M-I) and under basal conditions (M-0) can be obtained from this novel method during MTT in healthy and disease states.