USE OF GLUCOSE DISAPPEARANCE RATES (K(G)) TO MONITOR ENDOCRINE FUNCTION OF PANCREAS ALLOGRAFTS

Citation
Ds. Elmer et al., USE OF GLUCOSE DISAPPEARANCE RATES (K(G)) TO MONITOR ENDOCRINE FUNCTION OF PANCREAS ALLOGRAFTS, Clinical transplantation, 12(1), 1998, pp. 56-64
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Transplantation
Journal title
ISSN journal
09020063
Volume
12
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
56 - 64
Database
ISI
SICI code
0902-0063(1998)12:1<56:UOGDR(>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
We have reported that a decline in glucose disappearance rate (k(G)) i n pancreas transplant recipients is associated with pancreatic rejecti on, The purpose of this study was to determine test-retest reliability of k(G) monitoring and to establish the k(G) criteria for diagnosing abnormal graft function. Six healthy non-diabetic volunteers and 14 st able pancreas recipients underwent 2 intravenous glucose tolerance tes ts 7 d apart. All k(G) values in non-diabetic volunteers had < 15% var iation between the two determinations (r = 0.96, P less than or equal to 0.0006), Similarly, 13/14 recipients experienced < 20% variation in k(G) with one patients experiencing a 23% variation (r = 0.90, P less than or equal to 0.0001). Using a 20% change from baseline as the ref erence value, we monitored 28 pancreas recipients for 2-36 months post -transplant. Of 253 k(G) values, 160 (64%) did not exceed the 20% chan ge from baseline, 65 (26%) declined > 20% and 28 (11%) increased > 20% . Of 160 stable k(G) values, 154 (96%) were associated with normal gra ft function while 6 (4%) occurred in the context of rejection. Of 65 k (G) values declining by greater than or equal to 20%, 47 (72%) accurat ely identified acute rejections diagnosed by biopsy (70%) or response to treatment (30%), 12 (19%) were associated with identifiable causes of increased insulin resistance and only in 6 (9%) cases a cause for t he decline was unidentifiable. The k(G) values with > 20% rise from ba seline were, in 15%, associated with identifiable causes of decreased insulin resistance. The sensitivity of the k(G) as a marker for reject ion was 88.7%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 72.3%, negat ive predictive value 96.8%, and accuracy 90.5%, These data confirm tha t a > 20% deterioration of glucose disappearance rate is associated wi th pancreas allograft rejection, and confirms the utility of k(G) moni toring in clinical follow-up of pancreas transplant recipients.