Ra. Dolbeer et al., AERIAL-PHOTOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES TO ESTIMATE POPULATIONS OF LAUGHING GULL NESTS IN JAMAICA BAY, NEW-YORK, 1992-1995, Colonial waterbirds, 20(1), 1997, pp. 8-13
We evaluated aerial photography (full coverage, using fixed-wing aircr
aft) and aerial video (transects, using helicopter) surveys to estimat
e the population of Laughing Gull (Larus atricilla) nests in Jamaica B
ay New York, during June 1992-1995. We counted 4,920 nests in the colo
ny using aerial photography and estimated 5,367 nests using aerial vid
eo in 1992. In 1993-1995, we respectively counted 5,691, 5,095, and 6,
126 nests in the colony using aerial photography, and estimated from g
round plots that our counts differed from the actual number of nests b
y means of -9% to 1%. Overall (1993-1995) correction factors (by which
to multiply the aerial photography nest counts) to estimate the mean
and 95% lower and upper CI range of the nest population were 1.04, 0.9
6 and 1.13, respectively. Ninety-seven percent of nests identified usi
ng aerial photography or video had tl adult Laughing Gull present or w
ithin 1 m of the nest. The aerial video survey was less expensive ($2,
100 United States currency) than the aerial photography survey ($4,000
). The estimated cost of a total count of nests from the ground is $6,
700-$9,600. The aerial video survey provided an accurate estimate of t
he number of nests. Full-coverage aerial photography also provided an
accurate estimate of nests in addition to habitat, nest distribution a
nd nest density data.