Bf. Blackwell et Wb. Krohn, SPRING FORAGING DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT SELECTION BY DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS ON THE PENOBSCOT RIVER, MAINE USA, Colonial waterbirds, 20(1), 1997, pp. 66-76
Restoration of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to New England rivers
requires, in part, an understanding of the use of habitat and prey by
potential and known predators. We examined variation in habitat use b
y Double-crested Cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus), from April throug
h June 1992-94 on ca. 288 km of the 2 primary tributaries and the main
stem of the Penobscot River, Maine. Our objectives were to quantify te
mporal and spatial variation in habitat use and test for selection of
spring foraging habitats by cormorants. Cormorants forage during dayli
ght hours only To determine the distribution of foraging birds we cond
ucted aerial surveys at intervals of <8 days. Counts from individual a
erial surveys were analyzed relative to 9 river sections and used to e
xamine selection of foraging habitats, such as free-flowing areas and
the headponds and tailraces of darns. We defined selection as the diff
erence between the proportionate length of each river section relative
to the total river km available and the observed proportion of birds
using each section, All birds observed from the aircraft within a rive
r section were assumed to be foraging within that river section. Cormo
rants were first observed between 15 and 20 April in all 3 years. Indi
viduals consistently selected (P < 0.05) against use of 2 large tribut
aries and sections >105 km north of the mouth of the mainstem. However
, from late April through early June of all years, birds selected (P <
0.05) 4 of the 5 mainstem dams and the estuarine portion of the river
. Cormorant use of dams remained at or above expected levels until the
second week of June in all years. We suggest that cormorant selection
for foraging areas adjacent to clams reflected a higher availability
of prey possibly due to delay and injury of migrating Atlantic salmon
smelts. Cormorant selection of the estuarine portion of the Penobscot
River was likely a response to a seasonally increasing availability an
d abundance of estuarine and marine prey, in addition to resident fres
hwater species and migrating smelts.