Rb. Schifman et al., BLOOD CULTURE CONTAMINATION - A COLLEGE-OF-AMERICAN-PATHOLOGISTS Q-PROBES STUDY INVOLVING 640 INSTITUTIONS AND 497 134 SPECIMENS FROM ADULTPATIENTS, Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine, 122(3), 1998, pp. 216-221
Objective.-To examine clinical and laboratory practices associated wit
h contamination of blood culture specimens from adults. Design and Set
ting-A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement s
tudy involving prospective evaluation of adult blood culture contamina
tion rates in 640 institutions. Main Outcome Measure.-Proportion of co
ntaminated blood cultures. Results.-A total of 497 134 blood cultures
were studied. The median adult inpatient blood culture contamination r
ate was 2.5% (central 80th percentile = 0.9%-5.4%) by laboratory asses
sment. There was no significant difference in contamination rates betw
een inpatient and outpatient cultures (P = .273). The median contamina
tion rate by clinical assessment (2.1%) was significantly lower (P = .
005), primarily because of a lower proportion of cultures with coagula
se-negative Staphylococcus that were interpreted as contaminants when
only one of multiple specimens was positive. Specimen collection varia
bles associated with significantly lower contamination rates included
use of a dedicated phlebotomy service (P = .039), use of tincture of i
odine for skin disinfection (P = .036), and application of an antisept
ic to the top of the collection device before inoculation (P = .018).
Teaching institutions and high numbers of occupied beds were demograph
ic factors associated with higher contamination rates for inpatients b
ut not for outpatients. Culture parameters associated with higher cont
amination rates included microbial growth from a single specimen, isol
ation of certain microbial species (eg, coagulase-negative Staphylococ
cus), and longer time to detect growth in culture. Contamination rates
were not significantly affected by the type of blood culture method u
sed, specimen volume, or use of a double-needle collection procedure.
Conclusions.-There is wide variation in blood culture contamination ra
tes among institutions. Three specimen collection factors and three cu
lture variables were identified as having a significant effect on bloo
d culture contamination.