Tm. Youngfadok et al., PROPHYLACTIC OOPHORECTOMY IN COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 41(3), 1998, pp. 277-283
Controversy exists regarding the role of prophylactic oophorectomy dur
ing resection for primary colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: A prospective, r
andomized trial was initiated to evaluate the influence of oophorectom
y on recurrence and survival in patients with Dukes Stages B and C col
orectal cancer. METHOD: Between November 1986 and March 1997, 155 pati
ents were randomized to oophorectomy or no oophorectomy at laparotomy
for resection of colorectal cancer. RESULTS: No incidence of gross or
microscopic metastatic disease to the ovary was found among 77 patient
s randomized to oophorectomy, in contrast to previous reports. Prelimi
nary crude survival curves suggested a survival benefit for oophorecto
my between two and three years from surgery, but Kaplan-Meier survival
analysis indicated that this was not statistically significant and th
e benefit does not appear to persist at five years. Kaplan-Meier curve
s of recurrence-free survival, however, suggest a more substantial sep
aration of the curves, with 80 percent vs. 65 percent five-year diseas
e-free survival for oophorectomy us. nonoophorectomy, but further pati
ent accrual is necessary to provide sufficient statistical power. CONC
LUSIONS: Occult colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the ovaries has not
been documented in this series of putative Dukes Stages B and C tumor
s. The possibility of a recurrence-free survival advantage emphasizes
the need to continue this preliminary work.