Gd. Tollefson et al., DEPRESSIVE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA - A PROSPECTIVE BLINDED TRIAL OF OLANZAPINE AND HALOPERIDOL, Archives of general psychiatry, 55(3), 1998, pp. 250-258
Background: Depressive signs and symptoms during the course of schizop
hrenia are common and have been associated with impaired recovery and
a higher risk of self-harm. Novel antipsychotic agents introduce new p
harmacological avenues that may differentially affect schizophrenic si
gns and symptoms, including depression. Methods: This was a 17-country
investigation of 1996 patients with schizophrenia or a related diagno
sis randomly assigned to a blinded, comparative trial of the novel ant
ipsychotic agent olanzapine (5-20 mg/d) or the conventional D-2 antago
nist haloperidol (5-20 mg/d). Patients were evaluated with the Positiv
e and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating
Scale, and the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale. The trial consisted of a 6
-week and a 46-week masked responder maintenance period. Results: At l
east moderate depressive signs and symptoms (Montgomery-Asberg Depress
ion Rating Scale score, greater than or equal to 16) were seen in slig
htly more than half of this sample. Although both treatments were asso
ciated with short-term baseline-to-end point improvement on the Montgo
mery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, olanzapine-associated improvement
s were significantly superior to those observed with haloperidol (P=.0
01). Furthermore, the response rate for the group receiving olanzapine
(greater than or equal to 50% improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg De
pression Rating Scale after at least 3 weeks of treatment) was also si
gnificantly higher (P=.008). Analysis demonstrated that improvement in
positive, negative, and/or extrapyramidal symptoms was associated wit
h mood improvement (indirect effect); however, most of the olanzapine
treatment effect on mood was a primary direct effect (57%) that alone
was significantly greater than that seen with haloperidol treatment (P
<.001). Conclusions: Depressive signs and symptoms in schizophrenia ar
e responsive to treatment. The pleotrophic pharmacological features of
olanzapine, through 1 or more non-D-2-mediated pathways, likely contr
ibute to its superior treatment effect. Better control of the mood dis
orders accompanying schizophrenia holds the possibility for improved p
atient outcomes.