COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL CULTURE METHODS AND 2 COMMERCIAL ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS FOR DETECTION OF SALMONELLA IN PORCINE FECAL SAMPLES AND CECAL CONTENTS
Hc. Wegener et Dl. Baggesen, COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL CULTURE METHODS AND 2 COMMERCIAL ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS FOR DETECTION OF SALMONELLA IN PORCINE FECAL SAMPLES AND CECAL CONTENTS, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation, 9(4), 1997, pp. 352-356
Two commercial enzyme immunoassays, designated EIA-1 and EIA-2, for th
e detection of salmonella in feces and cecal contents were compared to
conventional culture methods. Out of 362 cecal content samples, 35 we
re positive by EIA-1 and 30 were positive by EIA-2 and conventional me
thods. Out of 189 fecal samples, 41 were positive by EIA-1, 30 were po
sitive by EIA-2, and 24 were positive by conventional culture methods.
The EIA-1 assay method detected more positive samples overall, althou
gh only comparison of the fecal samples was statistically significant.
The results indicate that the EIA-1 method is rapid, requiring only 2
4 hours, and may he more sensitive than the EIA-2 assay and convention
al culture techniques. Enzyme immunoassays for the detection elf salmo
nella in fecal samples or cecal contents provide a reasonable alternat
ive to conventional culture techniques.