OBJECTIVE: To determine the management of patients with new onset dysp
epsia by Canadian family physicians. METHODS: A survey was mailed to 1
95 family physicians in August 1995 to identify how they manage dyspep
sia in patients according to four scenarios: based on presenting sympt
oms alone; assuming Helicobacter pylori-positive known to be H pylori-
negative; and endoscopically confirmed nonulcer dyspepsia. RESULTS: A
total of 170 of 195 physicians (87.2%) completed the survey. Physician
s reported that 7.3% of their practice is devoted to dyspepsia and 23
% of these dyspeptic patients present for the first time. Ninety-three
per cent of family physicians find a symptom classification of ulcer-
, reflux- and dysmotility-like dyspepsia helpful. The majority of pati
ents are advised to make lifestyle changes and are treated with antaci
ds or empiric drug therapy. A H-2 receptor antagonist was the drug of
choice for ulcer and reflux-like dyspepsia, while prokinetics were oft
en used for reflux and dysmotility like dyspepsia. After failure of in
itial treatment, patients were given another course of empiric treatme
nt, commonly with cisapride or omeprazole. Family physicians estimated
that the mean time to obtain a gastrointestinal consult was five week
s, and 70% indicated that this time to consult adversely influenced th
eir decision to refer. If this time was reduced to less than two weeks
, responding physicians would consider referring all eligible patients
. On average, two to 2.5 courses of empiric therapy were given before
referral. If H pylori status was known, fewer empiric treatments (mean
1.8) were given before gastroenterological referral compared with the
other scenarios. If the patient had nonulcer dyspepsia, 30% of family
physicians provided reassurance only and did not prescribe empiric dr
ug treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Most newly dyspeptic patients in Canada are
treated with empiric therapy according to symptom classification and
referred for endoscopy after an average two to 2.5 treatment courses.