A CANADIAN PHYSICIAN SURVEY OF DYSPEPSIA MANAGEMENT

Citation
N. Chiba et al., A CANADIAN PHYSICIAN SURVEY OF DYSPEPSIA MANAGEMENT, Canadian journal of gastroenterology, 12(1), 1998, pp. 83-90
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
08357900
Volume
12
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
83 - 90
Database
ISI
SICI code
0835-7900(1998)12:1<83:ACPSOD>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the management of patients with new onset dysp epsia by Canadian family physicians. METHODS: A survey was mailed to 1 95 family physicians in August 1995 to identify how they manage dyspep sia in patients according to four scenarios: based on presenting sympt oms alone; assuming Helicobacter pylori-positive known to be H pylori- negative; and endoscopically confirmed nonulcer dyspepsia. RESULTS: A total of 170 of 195 physicians (87.2%) completed the survey. Physician s reported that 7.3% of their practice is devoted to dyspepsia and 23 % of these dyspeptic patients present for the first time. Ninety-three per cent of family physicians find a symptom classification of ulcer- , reflux- and dysmotility-like dyspepsia helpful. The majority of pati ents are advised to make lifestyle changes and are treated with antaci ds or empiric drug therapy. A H-2 receptor antagonist was the drug of choice for ulcer and reflux-like dyspepsia, while prokinetics were oft en used for reflux and dysmotility like dyspepsia. After failure of in itial treatment, patients were given another course of empiric treatme nt, commonly with cisapride or omeprazole. Family physicians estimated that the mean time to obtain a gastrointestinal consult was five week s, and 70% indicated that this time to consult adversely influenced th eir decision to refer. If this time was reduced to less than two weeks , responding physicians would consider referring all eligible patients . On average, two to 2.5 courses of empiric therapy were given before referral. If H pylori status was known, fewer empiric treatments (mean 1.8) were given before gastroenterological referral compared with the other scenarios. If the patient had nonulcer dyspepsia, 30% of family physicians provided reassurance only and did not prescribe empiric dr ug treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Most newly dyspeptic patients in Canada are treated with empiric therapy according to symptom classification and referred for endoscopy after an average two to 2.5 treatment courses.