SHIFTING PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING TO A PREFERRED HISTAMINE-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST - EFFECTS OF A MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION IN A MIXED-MODEL HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION
Jw. Brufsky et al., SHIFTING PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING TO A PREFERRED HISTAMINE-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST - EFFECTS OF A MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION IN A MIXED-MODEL HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION, Medical care, 36(3), 1998, pp. 321-332
OBJECTIVES. This study was undertaken to determine whether a program o
f education, therapeutic reevaluation of eligible patients, and perfor
mance feedback could shift prescribing to cimetidine from other histam
ine-2 receptor antagonists, which commonly are used in the management
of ulcers and reflux, and reduce costs without increasing rates of ulc
er-related hospital admissions. METHODS. This study used an interrupte
d monthly time series with comparison series in a large mixed-model he
alth maintenance organization. Physicians employed in health centers (
staff model) and physicians in independent medical groups contracting
to provide health maintenance organization services (group model) part
icipated. The comparative percentage prescribed of specific histamine-
2 receptor antagonists (market share), total histamine-2 receptor anta
gonist prescribing, cost per histamine-2 receptor antagonist prescript
ion, and the rate of hospitalization for gastrointestinal illness were
assessed. RESULTS. In the staff model, therapeutic reevaluation resul
ted in a sudden increase in market share of the preferred histamine-2
receptor antagonist cimetidine (+53.8%) and a sudden decrease in ranit
idine (-44.7%) and famotidine (-4.8%); subsequently, cimetidine market
share grew by 1.1% per month. In the group model, therapeutic reevalu
ation resulted in increased cimetidine market share (+9.7%) and decrea
sed prescribing of other histamine-2 receptor antagonists (ranitidine
-11.6%; famotidine -1.2%). Performance feedback did not result in furt
her changes in prescribing in either setting. Use of omeprazole, an ex
pensive alternative, essentially was unchanged by the interventions, a
s were overall histamine-2 receptor antagonist prescribing and hospita
l admissions for gastrointestinal illnesses. This intervention, which
cost approximately $60,000 to implement, resulted in estimated annual
savings in histamine-2 receptor antagonist expenditures of $1.06 milli
on. CONCLUSIONS. Annual savings in histamine-2 receptor antagonist exp
enditures after this multifaceted intervention were more than implemen
tation costs, with no discernible effects on numbers of hospitalizatio
ns. The magnitude of effect and cost savings were much greater in the
staff model; organizational factors and economic incentives may have c
ontributed to these differences. More research is needed to determine
the generalizability of this approach to other technologies and manage
d care settings.