G. Parker et al., AN ETIOLOGIC MODEL OF NONMELANCHOLIC DEPRESSION - STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY OF THE MEASURES, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 32(1), 1998, pp. 104-111
Objective: The aim of this paper is to describe an approach to sub-typ
ing nonmelancholic depression and to determine which raters from a var
iety of backgrounds provided the most valid information on study varia
bles. Method: A sample of non-melancholic depressed patients is descri
bed. Multiple raters (i.e. patients, psychiatrists, referrers and corr
oborative witnesses) completed measures of the patient's trait anxiety
levels, severity of recent life event stressors and personality funct
ioning. Results: The study and representative data are reported. Congr
uence between several measures employed indicated that psychiatrist ra
ting of disordered personality was superior to corroborative witness r
eport. Assessment of anxiety traits indicated reasonable agreement bet
ween referrers and corroborative witnesses but poor agreement between
those ratings and interview-elicited ratings. There were also discrepa
ncies in quantifying 'severity' of life event stress, with patients an
d their corroborative witnesses rating such events as more severe than
either the interviewing psychiatrist or psychiatrists involved in con
sensus rating sessions. Importantly, the psychiatrists' capacity to qu
antify the relative contribution of disordered personality, anxiety an
d life-event stress to the particular depressive episode was supported
, Conclusions: Results indicate some of the difficulties in operationa
lising determinants that may contribute to and sub-type the non-melanc
holic depressions, and demonstrate the advantages of using a range of
rating strategies and raters. In this study, psychiatrist-generated ju
dgements are clearly favoured, although the advantages of also assessi
ng trait anxiety and life-event stress impact by self-report strategie
s are conceded. Some techniques for estimating the contribution of dis
ordered personality function, anxiety and life-event stress are offere
d for both their research and their clinical utility.