Research shows that chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung ca
ncer (NSCLC) improves survival. The economic implications of this trea
tment choice may be substantial, This paper reviews studies examining
the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy in this setting. MEDLINE, PDQ,
Cancerlit, EMBASE, and the Nursing & Allied Health databases were sear
ched using the terms cost, cost-effectiveness, chemotherapy, and nonsm
all-cell lung cancer, The search identified 17 studies. Most of these
studies utilized data from various sources to model the impact and cos
t of chemotherapy, The remaining studies were concurrent or retrospect
ive analyses of individual clinical trials. Findings suggest that chem
otherapy for stages IIIb and IV non-small-cell lung cancer can be cost
-effective and, in some cases, may actually be less expensive than sup
portive care alone, Economic analyses also indicate that allocating re
sources for chemotherapy in this setting can be justified relative to
many treatment expenditures for other types of cancer and other diseas
es, Application of these findings may be hindered by the wide variety
of techniques used and by several methodologic issues, including the f
ailure to address patients' treatment preferences, Yet, economic analy
ses of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer can provide important inf
ormation to complement survival and quality-of-life data ill resource
allocation decisions.