WHO ARE EU - AMBIGUITIES IN THE CONCEPT OF COMPETITIVENESS

Authors
Citation
S. Strange, WHO ARE EU - AMBIGUITIES IN THE CONCEPT OF COMPETITIVENESS, Journal of Common Market studies, 36(1), 1998, pp. 101-114
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
International Relations",Business
ISSN journal
00219886
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
101 - 114
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9886(1998)36:1<101:WAE-AI>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Borrowing the title from Robert Reich's 1990 article, 'Who is US ?', I argue that it is first necessary to clear up some of the ambiguities in the current debate about European competitiveness if we are to deve lop a coherent and effective industrial and macroeconomic policy for E urope. Reich was adamant that the foreign-owned firms (FOFs) that loca ted production - and increasingly their research and design teams - in America were doing more for the American people (and, in the long run , for the American economy) than firms registered and headquartered in the US but whose output, and employees, were largely located elsewher e. Now that Asian firms as well as American ones are increasingly loca ting production in Europe rather than at home, the same argument holds good for Europe. Second, in order to determine and adopt the policies appropriate to making national societies, rather than national firms, competitive and viable, it is necessary to clear up some of the confu sion concerning the causes of increased competition among states and a mong firms. It is argued that these causes are structural and (since t he end of the Cold War) global. The most important of these are the ac celerating rate of technological change and its escalating capital cos ts and, as auxiliary factors, the added opportunities for internationa lizing production opened up by the increased mobility of capital, the improved efficiency of transport and communications and the general li beralization of the global trading system. Third, if the conclusions o f the first and second part are accepted, the crucial political issue concerns the choice of means appropriate in a world market economy to the chosen end of European competitiveness in terms of societies rathe r than of firms. The third part of the argument therefore discusses so me of the relevant policy issues: trade and investment policies, EU en largement, the common currency, social rules and charters, and welfare issues like health and education.