Borrowing the title from Robert Reich's 1990 article, 'Who is US ?', I
argue that it is first necessary to clear up some of the ambiguities
in the current debate about European competitiveness if we are to deve
lop a coherent and effective industrial and macroeconomic policy for E
urope. Reich was adamant that the foreign-owned firms (FOFs) that loca
ted production - and increasingly their research and design teams - in
America were doing more for the American people (and, in the long run
, for the American economy) than firms registered and headquartered in
the US but whose output, and employees, were largely located elsewher
e. Now that Asian firms as well as American ones are increasingly loca
ting production in Europe rather than at home, the same argument holds
good for Europe. Second, in order to determine and adopt the policies
appropriate to making national societies, rather than national firms,
competitive and viable, it is necessary to clear up some of the confu
sion concerning the causes of increased competition among states and a
mong firms. It is argued that these causes are structural and (since t
he end of the Cold War) global. The most important of these are the ac
celerating rate of technological change and its escalating capital cos
ts and, as auxiliary factors, the added opportunities for internationa
lizing production opened up by the increased mobility of capital, the
improved efficiency of transport and communications and the general li
beralization of the global trading system. Third, if the conclusions o
f the first and second part are accepted, the crucial political issue
concerns the choice of means appropriate in a world market economy to
the chosen end of European competitiveness in terms of societies rathe
r than of firms. The third part of the argument therefore discusses so
me of the relevant policy issues: trade and investment policies, EU en
largement, the common currency, social rules and charters, and welfare
issues like health and education.