Cy. Anderson et al., A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF SILICON PHTHALOCYANINE PHOTOSENSITIZER FOR IN-VIVO PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY OF RIF-1 TUMORS IN C3H MICE, Photochemistry and photobiology, 67(3), 1998, pp. 332-336
Photofrin(R) photodynamic therapy (PDT) has recently received FDA appr
oval for the palliative treatment of totally and partially obstructing
esophageal malignancies. However, there is a need for new PDT photose
nsitizers because Photofrin has a number of undesirable features, The
purpose Of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four amine-beari
ng silicon phthalocyanines-Pc4, Pc10, Pc12 and Pc18-as potential PDT p
hotosensitizers. Equimolar concentrations of these Pc were found to be
highly effective at causing the regression of RIF-1 tumors transplant
ed to C3H/HeN mice. The amount of Pc4 necessary to cause an equivalent
amount of tumor regression in this model system was substantially les
s than the amount of Photofrin. The cutaneous phototoxicity of the sil
icon PC photosensitizer was assessed by the utilization of the murine
ear-swelling model, When C3H mice were exposed to 167 J/cm(2) of polyc
hromatic visible light from a UVB-filtered solar simulator, which emit
ted UV radiation and visible light above 320 nm, the Pc produced littl
e, if any, cutaneous photosensitivity. These results indicate that Pc4
, Pc10, Pc12 and Pc18 are at lease as effective as Photofrirn in PDT p
rotocols, while at the same time addressing many of the drawbacks of P
hotofrin.