Recently certain post-modernist and post-modern feminist perspectives
maintain that the language of rights and justice has outlived its eman
cipatory potential sines ir is always addressed to the state and law,
leading to arming of the state with more powers. While approving of th
e need to counter this tendency of dependence on the state to initiate
changes, this article argues that popular movements nevertheless cann
ot do away with the language of rights as it remains the sole language
of proclaiming their subjectivity and agency, Moreover, the privilegi
ng of the particularistic nature af rights-claim in the post-modem dis
course is itself paradoxically premised on a universal nation of equal
ity for its justification. All people have a right to their own way of
life, cultures and belief-systems only if we hold that no single cult
ure or rationality can be privileged over the others.