Jm. Baskin et al., THE COMPARATIVE AUTECOLOGY OF ENDEMIC, GLOBALLY-RARE, AND GEOGRAPHICALLY-WIDESPREAD, COMMON-PLANT SPECIES - 3 CASE-STUDIES, The Southwestern naturalist, 42(4), 1997, pp. 384-399
The autecology (species biology) of each of three federal-endangered,
narrowly-endemic plant species (Echinacea tanesseensis, Ilamna corei,
Solidago shortii) was compared with that of a geographically-widesprea
d congener (E. angustifolia, I. rivularis, S. altissima) via research
and/or literature reviews. The Echinacea and Ilamna species are very c
lose relatives, and the Solidago species are in the same subsection of
the genus. Particular attention was given to the Echinacea species. N
o differences were found in ecological, morphological, physiological,
cytological, genetic or life history characteristics per se of E. tenn
esseensis and E. angustifolia that reasonably could account for differ
ences in their geographical distribution. Thus, a scenario based on hi
storical factors was used in conjunction with the autecology of E. ten
nesseensis to explain development and maintenance of endemism in this
species. Likewise, no difference in species biology was identified in
the two fire-dependent, fire-adapted Iliamna species, and thus endemis
m in I. corei also probably is related to both autecological and histo
rical factors. In contrast to the species pairs in Echinacea and Iliam
na, the widespread Solidago altissima has, a greater potential to form
a persistent seed bank and is a better competitor than the narrow end
emic S. shortii. However, these autecological differences per se shoul
d be used with caution in any attempt to explain maintenance of narrow
endemism in S. shortii. We conclude that both autecological and histo
rical factors are needed to explain endemism in many plant species.