We reviewed 71 consecutive spinal cord injuries to determine the facto
rs influencing neurological recovery. Sixty-three (35 tetraplegics and
28 paraplegics) were available for follow-up at a mean of 29.6 months
. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scoring system was use
d on admission and at follow-up to determine change in neurological st
atus. Treatment with corticosteroids or surgical intervention had no s
ignificant effect on outcome. Tetraplegics, both complete and incomple
te, had a significantly better outcome than paraplegics (p<0.02). inco
mplete cord injury carried a better prognosis of motor recovery (p<0.0
001). Pattern of injury was an important determinant of recovery in th
e complete tetraplegia group. We conclude that many factors influence
recovery following spinal cord injury and the effect of treatment may
be difficult to demonstrate. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights
reserved.