Preventing and treating childhood cruelty to animals will require a) q
ualitative as well as quantitative, assessment methods and b) specific
ation of the varied motivations for such behavior: Although some infor
mation is available about the prevalence and frequency of animal maltr
eatment in samples of children and adolescents, especially those diagn
osed with Conduct Disorder; other dimensions of such maltreatment (e.g
. severity, chronicity) are only beginning to be explored. We describe
the research and development process leading to construction of a sem
i-structured interview, the Children and Animals (Cruelty to Animals)
Assessment Instrument (CAAI), for use with children over four years of
age and their parents, to obtain information on animal maltreatment.
The CAAI was field-tested with a community and clinical sample of twen
ty children and included children in day treatment and residential pro
grams for emotionally disturbed youth, incarcerated adolescents, and c
hildren accompanying their mothers to shelters for battered women. The
dimensions of cruelty to animals scorable using the CAAI include: SEV
ERITY(degree of intentional pain/injury caused), FREQUENCY (number of
separate acts), DURATION (period of time over which cruelty occurred),
REGENCY (most current acts), DIVERSITY ACROSS AND WITHIN CATEGORIES (
number of types and number of animals within a type that were abused),
ANIMAL SENTIENCE LEVEL, COVERT (related to child's attempts to concea
l cruelty), ISOLATE (individual versus group cruelty), and EMPATHY (in
dications of remorse or concern for the injured animal). A method is d
escribed for converting these ratings to numerical scores in which hig
her scores indicate more severe, problematic cruelty. Varied motivatio
ns for children's cruelty to animals are discussed including curiosity
and peer reinforcement, modification of mood state, imitation of adul
t cruelty, and using animals as an ''implement'' of self-injury. The n
eed for the CAAI is especially critical for assessment since we often
found discrepancies between parent reports on one-item cruelty-to-anim
als assessments (e.g., Child Behavior Checklist) and CAAI results.