Congress has sought to address the issue of transitional economies thr
ough the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN), whi
ch is supposed to provide workers and their communities with advance n
otice of a shutdown. With advance notice, workers can then plan for th
e closure and avail themselves of the transitional type services avail
able under other programs. By this theory, then, WARN might be viewed
as a stepping stone in the direction of a more comprehensive employmen
t policy. This, however, presupposes that the states administering oth
er programs through their Dislocated Worker Units (DWU) are actually r
eceiving accurate information closures and compliance with WARN in the
ir jurisdiction. In this paper, I examine WARN both in theory and in p
ractice. Data drawn from surveys conducted of DWUs suggests that the i
nformation we have about closure, its impact, and WARN is uneven, and
therefore does not easily lend itself to a clear policy path.