The best known revisionist perspective on the so-called ''tragedy of t
he commons'' underscores important conceptual and hence policy errors
and has been important in contributing to understanding of conditions
in which collective action for common benefits, with respect to common
pool resources, can take place. Characterizing this perspective as a
''thin'' or abstract, generalizing explanatory model, with strengths a
nd weaknesses thereby, we discuss a ''thicker'' or more ethnographic p
erspective that emphasizes the importance of specifying property right
s and their embeddedness within discrete and changing historical momen
ts, social and political relations. We argue that this perspective lea
ds to a focus on ''community failure'' rather than ''market failure''
as the presumed cause of environmental problems, and hence, to questio
ns about how markets, states, and other external and internal factors
affect the capacities of communities and user-groups to respond adequa
tely to environmental change.