Background-We determined the effect of incorporating the results of ei
ght recently published trials of Hmg CoA reductase inhibitors (''stati
ns'') on the conclusions fi-om our previously published meta-analysis
regarding the clinical benefit of cholesterol lowering. Methods and Re
sults-We used the same analytic approach as in our previous investigat
ion, separating the specific effects of cholesterol lowering from the
effects attributable to the different types of intervention studied, T
he reductions in coronary heart disease (CHD) and total mortality risk
observed for the statins fell near the predictions from our earlier m
eta-analysis. Including the statin trial findings into the calculation
s led to a prediction that for every 10 percentage points of cholester
ol lowering, CHD mortality risk would be reduced by 15% (P<.001), and
total mortality risk would be reduced by 11% (P<.001), as opposed to t
he values of 13% and 10%, respectively, reported previously. Cholester
ol lowering in general and by the statins in particular does not incre
ase non-CHD mortality risk. Conclusions-Adding the results from the st
atin trials confirmed our original conclusion that lowering cholestero
l is clinically beneficial. The relationships (slope) between choleste
rol lowering and reduction in CHD and total mortality) risk became str
onger, and the standard error of the estimated slopes decreased by abo
ut half. Use of statins does not increase non-CHD mortality risk. The
effect of the statins on CHD and total mortality risk can be explained
by their lipid-lowering ability and appears to be directly proportion
al to the degree to which they lower lipids.