NITROGEN PARTITIONING IN APPLE AS AFFECTED BY TIMING AND TREE GROWTH HABIT

Citation
H. Khemira et al., NITROGEN PARTITIONING IN APPLE AS AFFECTED BY TIMING AND TREE GROWTH HABIT, Journal of horticultural science & biotechnology, 73(2), 1998, pp. 217-223
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Horticulture
ISSN journal
14620316
Volume
73
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
217 - 223
Database
ISI
SICI code
1462-0316(1998)73:2<217:NPIAAA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Nine year old standard-(Std) 'Topred Delicious' and spur-type 'Redspur Delicious' apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) on Malling 7A (M.7A) rootstocks were fertilized with ground-applied ammonium nitrate or fol iarly-applied urea depleted in N-15 on various dates. The treatments c onsisted of a ground application in spring (March) (SG), a preharvest ground application in August (PHG), a foliar spray in fall (September) (FF), or a combination of each of the last two treatments with SG (SG /PHG and SG/FF). All trees received a total of 120 g N each with the e xception of FF trees, which received half the dose. Labelled N from th e SG application was allocated preferentially to the fruit, leaves, sh oots, and branches and to a lesser extent to the roots. Leaves on youn g shoots had higher concentrations of N-15 label than those on older s hoots or spurs, indicating an increasing dependence of the tree on soi l N from spring to summer. The amount of N allocated to above-ground t issues decreased as the season progressed. Very little N-15 from the P HG application reached the leaves, fruit, buds, or branches but the ro ots were heavily labelled and substantial amounts of labelled N were f ound in the following season's fruit, leaves, and shoots. Losses of fe rtilizer-N-15 from the PHG application to fruit removal, leaf fall, an d pruning were minimal suggesting a higher utilization efficiency of a bsorbed N. The percentage of N derived from the FF spray was low in al l tissues. However, this treatment resulted in N-15 reaching the buds and shoots. Spur-type tree tissues tended to have higher N and N-15 co ncentrations compared with those of Std-type trees. These differences appear to be related to different tree size. These differences suggest that the smaller spur-type trees are more manipulable with N manageme nt, and may be more subject to the adverse effects of over-fertilizati on. The subtle differences in N partitioning between tree types may ca use spur-type trees to recycle N more efficiently.