The literature on validation and verification of knowledge-based syste
ms contains a catalogue of anomalies for knowledge-based systems, such
as redundant, contradictory or deficient knowledge. Detecting such an
omalies is a method for verifying knowledge-based systems. Unfortunate
ly, the traditional formulation of the anomalies in the literature is
very specific to a rule-based knowledge representation, which greatly
restricts their applicability. In this paper, we show how the traditio
nal anomalies can be reinterpreted in terms of conceptual models (in p
articular KADS inference structures). For this purpose, we present a f
ormalisation of KADS inference structures which enables us to apply th
e traditional rule-base anomalies to these inference structures. This
greatly improves the usefulness of the anomalies, since they can now b
e applied to a much wider class of knowledge-based systems. Besides th
is reformulation and wider applicability of the traditional anomalies,
further contributions of this paper are a novel formalisation of KADS
inference structures and a number of improvements to the existing for
malisation of the traditional anomalies. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V
.