M. Baines et al., THE EFFECTS OF ARABLE FIELD MARGIN MANAGEMENT ON THE ABUNDANCE AND SPECIES RICHNESS OF ARANEAE (SPIDERS), Ecography, 21(1), 1998, pp. 74-86
The effects of ten different management regimes on the abundance and s
pecies richness of Araneae on pre-existing and newly expanded zones of
field margins surrounding arable fields are compared in a large-scale
experiment conducted between 1987 and 1991. Most of the management re
gimes involved varying the timing and frequency with which the field m
argins were cut. There was no evidence of consistent temporal trends i
n the abundance and species richness of Araneae on either the existing
or expanded zones of the field margins during the first four years of
the experiment. However, lowest numbers were recorded before expansio
n of the margins in 1987, and highest numbers in the final sample, in
1991. Araneae remained less abundant, and less species rich, on the ne
wly expanded than on the existing zones of the field margins four year
s after they were 'set-aside'. Cutting reduced both abundance and spec
ies richness. Regimes which included cutting in mid-summer had a great
er impact which persisted for longer than did those involving cutting
in spring and autumn. Removal of cut material was associated with lowe
r species richness than leaving it in situ. Sowing the margins with a
wild flower seed mixture was associated with increased abundance and s
pecies richness of Araneae, Annual spraying with a broad-spectrum, non
-persistent herbicide reduced the abundance of Araneae but the effect
was not detectable until several months after the application of the s
pray. Both the species richness and abundance of Araneae were positive
ly correlated with a measure of vegetation height made on the field ma
rgins in September, on both the pre-existing and newly expanded zones
of the margins. The extent to which management practices which benefit
Araneae are compatible with both the management requirements for vari
ous other taxa, and the overriding constraint of effective pernicious
weed control on field margins, is discussed.