M. Dowton et al., EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE BRACONIDAE (HYMENOPTERA, ICHNEUMONOIDEA) INFERRED FROM PARTIAL 16S RDNA GENE-SEQUENCES, Insect molecular biology, 7(2), 1998, pp. 129-150
Phylogenetic relationships among the Braconidae were examined using ho
mologous 16S rDNA gene sequence data. Analyses recovered the few well-
supported relationships evident in this family from morphological anal
yses, viz the monophyly of the microgastroid complex of subfamilies, t
he monophyly of the cyclostome complex of subfamilies (= braconoids),
a sister-group relationship between the Alysiinae and Opiinae, and a c
lose relationship between the Helconinae and Blacinae. With respect to
the braconoid complex of subfamilies, a sister-group relationship was
recovered between Aphidiinae and Mesostoinae, and a clade composed of
Gnamptodontinae + Histeromerinae + Rhyssalinae + Aphidiinae + Mesosto
inae was also recovered. The Doryctinae and Rogadinae sensu lato (s.l.
) were generally not resolved as monophyletic, With respect to the hel
conoid complex of subfamilies, a sister-group relationship was recover
ed between Sigalphinae and Agathidinae, whereas Neoneurinae fell out a
mong other helconoid subfamilies, Other relationships among the helcon
oid subfamilies were unclear from these analyses. With respect to the
microgastroid complex of subfamilies, our data conform to morphologica
l estimates, recovering ((Microgastrinae + Miracinae) + Cardiochilinae
) + Cheloninae. The topology of our trees suggests that the cyclostome
subfamilies are a natural derived group, inferring that endoparasitis
m (not ectoparasitism) is the ancestral state for the Braconidae, unle
ss all of the ectoparasitic ancestors of the helconoid + microgastroid
subfamilies are now extinct.