Bb. Michniak et al., IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF AZONE ANALOGS AS DERMAL PENETRATION ENHANCERS - V - MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS, International journal of pharmaceutics, 161(2), 1998, pp. 169-178
Dermal penetration enhancers were evaluated (14) using diffusion cell
techniques, hairless mouse skin and hydrocortisone as the model drug.
The following were synthesized: 1-dodecanoylpiperidine (1), 1-dodecano
ylpyrrolidine (2), 1-dodecanoyl-2-piperidinone (3), 1-dodecanoyl-2-pyr
rolidinone (4), 2-decylcyclohexanone (5), 2-decylcyclopentanone (6), 4
-(dodecanoyl)-thiomorpholine (7), N,N-didodecylacetamide (8) and N-dod
ecyltricyclo [3.3.1.1(3,7)]decane-1-carboxamide (11). N-Acetylcaprolac
tam (9), 4-acetylmorpholine (10) and N-dodecylpyrrolidinone (13) were
purchased. The syntheses of Azone, N-(1-oxododecyl)morpholine (12) and
N-dodecyl-2-piperidinone (14) have been reported previously. Enhancer
s were applied at 0.4 M in propylene glycol (PG) (or as a suspension)
to mouse skin. Hydrocortisone (0.03 M in PG) was applied 1 h following
enhancer treatment. Controls (no pretreatment) yielded 24 h diffusion
cell receptor concentrations (Q(24)) of 9.93 +/- 3.15 mu M and model
drug skin retention of 26.1 +/- 5.6 mu g g(-1). Compound 7 yielded a h
igh Q(24) of 208.18 +/- 39.52 mu M. The highest skin retention was obs
erved with 6 of 566.7 +/- 39.7 mu g g(-1). Azone gave values of 218.96
+/- 47.84 mu M for Q(24) and 294.9 +/- 66.7 mu g g(-1) for skin reten
tion. Compounds 13 and 14 gave Q(24) values of 274.44 +/- 50.90 and 22
0.21 +/- 59.63 mu M and skin retention values of 226.5 +/- 51.8 and 25
9.0 +/- 62.2 mu g g(-1), respectively. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.