Approaches to labour-market policy and to workfare are conditioned by
different perspectives on the causes of and prospects for unemployment
and social exclusion. There appears to be a high level of correlation
between advocates of workfare and those who use terms like the 'cultu
re of dependency' and the 'underclass'. At this end of the debate, ass
umptions about the values and behaviour of people who are unemployed o
r who are lone parents lead to a belief that compulsion is necessary t
o break that behaviour and change those values. Advocates of active la
bour-marker policy might be more uncomfortable with assumptions that t
he values and behaviour of these groups are different from those of ma
instream society. For them, there are constraints and incentives which
affect everyone, and the policy issues relate to relaxing those const
raints and changing those incentives. The Labour Government reflects t
he tensions between these two broad approaches. Some senior ministers
are happy to talk about the 'underclass' and welfare dependency. Other
s stress the vital need for further growth in regular employment as th
e fundamental pre-requisite for any work or training programme to succ
eed.