The significance of E. S. Spelke and colleagues' (E. S. Spelke & C. Ho
fsten, 1986; E. S. Spelke & R. Kestenbaum, 1986; E. S. Spelke, R. Kest
enbaum, D. J. Simons, & D. Wein, 1995) results that conflict with J. P
iaget's (1952, 1955) theory of the object concept development was exam
ined by a modified replication of E. S. Spelke and R. Kestenbaum's stu
dy. The present study involved 2- to 4-year-olds and events consisting
of teddy bear pictures moving along a continuous or discontinuous cou
rse, with entering and exiting figures identical (ID) to or different
(DIF) from one another. Ferry participants in each age group saw all e
vents in random order and gave verbal interpretations. The authors jud
ged ID events as involving 1 object and DIF events as involving 2 obje
cts. Continuity of movement failed to affect judgments of numerical id
entity. Implications for Piaget's theory and Spelke's theory are discu
ssed.