We examined the malleability of verbal reports by manipulating pressur
es to comply in an hypnotic context, but independently of hypnotic pro
cedures. In both experiments, hypnotizable subjects received a baselin
e and an hypnotic-deafness condition wherein they were required to rat
e the intensity of a pure tone 10 s following completion of the tone.
In Experiment 1, subjects biased their reported loudness reductions in
response to a trial 3 demand instruction, but not to a similarly dist
racting, though nondemanding, instruction. In Experiment 2, half of th
e demand instruction subjects received bogus polygraphic feedback chal
lenging the veracity of their loudness ratings. The results here indic
ate that all demand instruction subjects biased their initial trial 3
reports; however, only those receiving polygraphic feedback recanted t
heir initially biased trial 3 responses. The findings suggest that rep
orting biases, reflecting purposeful deception, play a critical role i
n hypnotic responding. (C) 1998 Academic Press.