S. Niveloni et al., USEFULNESS OF VIDEODUODENOSCOPY AND VITAL DYE STAINING AS INDICATORS OF MUCOSAL ATROPHY OF CELIAC-DISEASE - ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 47(3), 1998, pp. 223-229
Background: The present study was designed to determine the diagnostic
usefulness of videoduodenoscopic inspection alone and the addition of
vital dye staining in the detection of celiac disease. We additionall
y sought to evaluate interobserver agreement for specific duodenoscopi
c markers of mucosal atrophy. Methods: One hundred sixty-seven consecu
tive subjects who underwent duodenoscopy for intestinal biopsy were in
cluded in a prospective controlled study. Endoscopic examination was p
erformed by experienced endoscopists according to a set protocol using
methylene blue (1%) dye. All procedures were recorded on videotape, b
ut only 20 (10 with atrophy and 10 normal) were used in a blinded, ind
ependent, randomized analysis by five reviewers to evaluate interobser
ver agreement. Endoscopic signs indicative of mucosal atrophy were as
follows: reduction in the number or loss of Kerkring's folds, ''scallo
ped'' folds, ''mosaic pattern,'' and visualization of the underlying b
lood vessels. Results: Eighty-seven patients had celiac disease (57 ne
wly diagnosed, 30 when treated). Seven treated patients had nonatrophi
c mucosa. In 80 patients the final diagnosis excluded celiac disease.
Videoendoscopic inspection alone correctly identified 75 of 80 patient
s with complete mucosal atrophy and 86 of 87 with normal mucosa. False
-negative diagnoses occurred in treated celiac patients with mild atro
phy. Mosaic pattern (89%) and scalloped folds (86%) were the most usef
ul endoscopic signs. Vital dye staining, as assessed by experienced en
doscopists, provided identical results to those obtained by inspection
alone. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive
values for the presence of one or more than one feature were 94%, 100
%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. The agreement (kappa statistics) among
observers was excellent for the mosaic pattern (kappa: 0.76 for both
the videoendoscopic inspection alone and dye staining) and the scallop
ed folds (kappa: 0.83 and 0.76, respectively) and was fair (kappa: 0.4
1 and 0.59, respectively) for the reduction in the number or loss of d
uodenal folds. Conclusion: This study confirms that videoduodenoscopy
is useful in the detection of intestinal atrophy. Dye staining produce
s a better delineation of scalloped folds and mosaic pattern in the at
rophic mucosa, but did not provide additional information to the exper
t endoscopist. Finally, interobserver agreement was excellent for the
most prevalent signs.