Jd. Carline et al., PRECOLLEGE ENRICHMENT PROGRAMS INTENDED TO INCREASE THE REPRESENTATION OF MINORITIES IN MEDICINE, Academic medicine, 73(3), 1998, pp. 288-298
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal","Education, Scientific Disciplines","Medical Informatics
The authors reviewed the literature published from 1966 to 1996 to ide
ntify enrichment programs for underrepresented minority precollege stu
dents sponsored by medical schools and affiliated programs, finding 19
articles describing 27 programs. The authors categorized the reported
programs according to the components they contained. Most programs co
ntained more than one component type. Twenty-four programs had an acad
emic enhancement component. Tyro thirds had a motivational component t
o encourage students to consider medical and other health careers, Two
programs set up mentoring relationships between students and health p
rofessionals, There were four research apprenticeships and three acade
mic partnerships between medical schools and local school districts. T
welve of the 27 programs were evaluated in the literature. Eight evalu
ations focused on identifying the numbers of students who continued th
eir education into college and professional schools. Five programs rep
orted participant satisfaction or identified other short-term outcomes
such as gains on standardized tests. While the percentage of particip
ants completing college and entering health care careers is impressive
, the authors do not believe that the educational success of participa
nts can be attributed to involvement in these programs.The authors rec
ommend ways to improve the quality and interpretability of enrichment
program evaluations. Evaluators should adopt common terminology for ac
tivities and outcomes. Participants' economic and educational disadvan
tages should be described. Programs' theoretical underpinnings should
be identified and related to evaluation. Measures should include immed
iate effects as well as long-term outcomes. Where possible, data from
comparison groups should be reported to support conclusions. Adequate
funding needs to be available to design and complete reasonable evalua
tions.