Dk. Litzelman et al., BENEFICIAL AND HARMFUL EFFECTS OF AUGMENTED FEEDBACK ON PHYSICIANS CLINICAL-TEACHING PERFORMANCES, Academic medicine, 73(3), 1998, pp. 324-332
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal","Education, Scientific Disciplines","Medical Informatics
Purpose, To evaluate whether clinical-teaching skills could be improve
d by providing teachers with augmented student feedback, Method. A ran
domized, controlled trial in 1994 included 42 attending physicians and
39 residents from the Department of Medicine at the Indiana Universit
y School of Medicine who taught 110 students on medicine ward rotation
s for one-month periods. Before teaching rotations, intervention group
teachers received norm-referenced, graphic summaries of their teachin
g performances as rated by students. At mid-month, intervention group
teachers received students' ratings augmented by individualized teachi
ng-effectiveness guidelines based on the Stanford Faculty Development
Program framework. Linear models were used to analyze the students' me
an ratings of teaching behaviors at mid-month and end-of-month, Indepe
ndent: variables included performance ratings, intervention status, te
acher status, teaching experience, and interactions with baseline rati
ngs, Results. Complex interactions with baseline performance were foun
d for most teaching categories at mid-month and end-of-month. The inte
rvention-group teachers who had high baseline performance scores had h
igher student ratings than did the control group teachers with similar
baseline scores; the intervention group teachers who had low baseline
performance scores were rated lower than were the control group teach
ers with comparable baseline scores. The residents who had medium or h
igh baseline stores were rated higher than were the attending physicia
ns with comparable baseline scores; the performance of the residents w
ho had low baseline scores was similar to that of the attending physic
ians with comparable baseline scores. Conclusion, Baseline performance
is important for targeting those teachers most likely to benefit from
augmented student feedback, Potential deterioration in teaching perfo
rmance warrants a reconsideration of distributing students' ratings to
teachers with low baseline performance scores.