Xj. Zhang et al., KETAMINE ANESTHESIA CAUSES GREATER MUSCLE CATABOLISM IN RABBITS THAN DOES PROPOFOL, Journal of nutritional biochemistry, 8(3), 1997, pp. 133-139
Whereas ketamine and propofol are popular anesthetics in the intensive
care unit and trauma/burn surgery, their metabolic effects are not kn
own. Because traumatized patients are under catabolic state and may ne
ed multiple operations over the acute period of treatment, the knowled
ge of metabolic effects of anesthetics should hale clinical relevance.
We have compared muscle protein kinetics in rabbits under ketamine or
propofol anesthesia. Because propofol is given in a fat emulsion (Int
ralipid), we have also tested the Effect of Intralipid in an additiona
l group of animals under ketamine anesthesia by giving the same dose o
f Intralipid as in the propofol group. In all animals, xylazine was us
ed as a supplemental anesthetic and a balanced amino acid infusion (10
% Travasol) was infused at 2 mg.kg(-1).min(-1).L-[ring-C-13(6)]phenyla
lanine tons infused as a tracer and the arteriovenous balance method w
as applied to the hindlimb for determination of muscle protein kinetic
s. Results: the rate of muscle protein breakdown was significantly gre
ater in the ketamine group than in the propofol group and intermediate
in the lipid group. These results were consistent with whole body pro
tein breakdown rates reflected by total phenylalanine flux. Rates of m
uscle protein synthesis were not significantly different among the gro
ups. Consequently, the ketamine group had significantly greater net lo
ss of muscle protein. We conclude that in relation to propofol, ketami
ne has a greater catabolic effect on muscle protein, which can be atte
nuated by lipid infusion. Therefore, ketamine is not an optimal anesth
etic for catabolic patients. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 1997.