DISPOSITION AFTER ACUTE STROKE - WHO IS NOT SENT HOME FROM HOSPITAL

Citation
Sm. Lai et al., DISPOSITION AFTER ACUTE STROKE - WHO IS NOT SENT HOME FROM HOSPITAL, Neuroepidemiology, 17(1), 1998, pp. 21-29
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
02515350
Volume
17
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
21 - 29
Database
ISI
SICI code
0251-5350(1998)17:1<21:DAAS-W>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background: Known demographic and clinical characteristics of stroke s urvivors that affect selection of the facility to which they are disch arged after hospitalization for an acute stroke are, for the most part , not population based and therefore may be unrepresentative. We prese nt an analysis of such characteristics using the Lehigh Valley stroke cohort which is population based. Method: We enrolled patients within 1 month of onset of their initial acute stroke who were hospitalized b etween 1987 and 1989 at one of the eight hospitals in the Lehigh Valle y, and 662 patients were discharged alive. The facility to which they were discharged was known for 660. Data on age, sex, presence of five selected comorbidities (hypertension, myocardial infarction, cardiac a rrhythmia, diabetes mellitus and transient ischemic attacks), length o f hospitalization and neurologic deficits from the stroke were systema tically collected on standardized forms. Polytomous logistic regressio n was used to determine the factors associated with not being discharg ed home. Relative risk (RR) associated with discharge to a nursing or rehabilitation facility for each independent predictor was calculated using as the referent, those who went home. Results: Older age was a s tatistically significant predictor of not being sent home (RR = 1.2 fo r nursing home placement), but gender and living with a spouse were no t. Having a selected comorbidity did not increase the RR of not being sent home regardless of the type, nor did risk of not being sent home increase with more than one illness. Considering neurologic deficits f rom the stroke, patients with lower extremity weakness had a 2.6- and 3.5-fold risk of being sent to a nursing or a rehabilitation facility, respectively, compared to those without such weakness while for those with upper extremity weakness, the RR was 1.5 and 4.9, respectively. Language deficit imposed a RR of 3.1 and 2.3 of going to a nursing or rehabilitation facility, respectively. Right facial weakness also emer ged as a significant risk factor for not being discharged home, perhap s because of its association with language deficit. The longer a patie nt was hospitalized after a stroke, the less likely it was that such a patient would go home (RR = 1.1/hospitalization day). Conclusion: Usi ng population-based data on stroke survivors, our study showed the cha racteristics of patients who are less likely to be discharged home and , instead, are discharged to a nursing or a rehabilitation facility. D ata like ours which were population based may be useful in discharge p lanning for stroke patients by policy makers and health care providers .