Statement of problem. Percussion, visual observation, and conventional
periapical radiographs are the methods most frequently used clinicall
y to evaluate the accuracy of implant component assemblies, whereas me
thods to measure the: precision of fit are limited. Purpose. In this s
tudy the Periotest instrument was used to evaluate the stability of th
e interfaces between the implant and the abutment, along with the abut
ment and the gold cylinder under a series of assembly conditions. The
hypothesis tested is that a more negative Periotest value (PTV) would
indicate an accurate fit and a more positive value PTV would correlate
with an inaccurate fit. Material and methods. To investigate this hyp
othesis in vitro, two bovine ribs were used as patient simulation mode
ls. Each model contained three self-tapping Branemark implants placed
approximately 7 to 10 mm apart and arranged in a reasonable curvature.
A series of component assembly conditions were created as accurate an
d inaccurate with thickness gauges of 25.4 mu m, 50.8 mu m, and 101.6
mu m. Results. The mean Periotest values and SDs for accurately assemb
led abutments and gold cylinders were 6.0 +/- 0.32 and -3.4 +/- 0.68,
respectively. Periotest value data of the assembly conditions were sta
tistically analyzed with multiple regression analysis. The misfit in t
he implant to abutment interface resulted in a more negative Periotest
value trend (r = 0.54) with increases in gauge thickness. However, th
e same magnitudes of misfit at the abutment to gold cylinder interface
produced a more positive Periotest value trend (r = 0.72). Conclusion
. The PTV trends were consistent with increased stability at the abutm
ent to implant interface from the increasing magnitude of misfit creat
ed with the thickness gauges. In contrast, the measurement trends obse
rved for the abutment to gold cylinder interface were consistent with
decreased stability with each increase in gauge thickness inserted at
the interface.